CC BY is often the default license publishers use for open publications, allowing others to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon work, even commercially, with attribution. This allows for the maximum dissemination and use of licensed materials. But depending on other elements in the work you don’t own or control copyright and the preferences of co-authors, CC BY might not be the best choice.
You and your co-authors need to decide whether or not you want to allow others to make changes or “derivatives” to the work, or whether you want to restrict others from using the work as is. You can indicate that you want others have rights to use the work itself, or you can indicate that others have rights to use derivatives of the work. If you want to encourage others to make interesting new works from the work, or customize it for their own needs, you will want to allow others to make derivatives.
Here are some things to consider:
- Are you okay with allowing other people to copy and distribute your content without asking for permission every time? This could entail downloading, sharing a copy with a friend, or posting a copy online. If not, then you do not want to use a Creative Commons license.
- Are you okay with others changing or adapting content, such as translating into another language or reformatting for improved accessibility?
- What about allowing remixing or making a mashup of the content?
- If remixing is acceptable, do you want to limit how others can release their remixes? If not, you will want to consider a license that includes a Sharealike element.
- You should apply the “ShareAlike” terms if you want the work and adaptations of the work to be incorporated into Wikipedia, for example. This will help the digital commons grow over time.
- Do you want to allow others to make money off of your content?