Skip to Main Content

Conducting Research

Tips from your Washington University librarians on locating, evaluating, and citing sources used in your research.

Things to Ask Yourself When Evaluating Your Sources

In conducting your own research, you must wisely evaluate the articles, books, journals, and websites you use.  Use the criteria in the next tabs to assess possible sources.

Authorship

Be aware of the authority with which the author speaks. If the author is one in your own field of study, is he/she a well-known and well-regarded name you recognize?  If the author is unknown to you, consider the following questions when evaluating a source’s credibility:

  • Is there information about the author, such as institutional affiliation, credentials, and contact information? 
  • Is there a link out to a personal website or an "About" page?

If none of the above information is present, search for the author’s e-mail address to request further information on his/her work and professional background.

Publisher and Point-of-View

A scholarly article is published in a journal with an academic affiliation.  This generally means that the author's article has undergone a peer review process in order to verify that it meets the publisher’s standards.  Thus, an article appearing in a scholarly publication may be trusted.  For books, also make note of the publisher.  Does it come from an academic press? 
For documents found on the web this question becomes more difficult as there is no publisher in the traditional sense.  Ask the following questions to assess websites:

  • Is the name of any organization given on the document you are reading?  Is there contact information?
  • Does this document reside on the Web server of an organization that has a clear stake in the issue at hand?  Look at the URL.
  • Do you recognize the name of the organization? Is this organization suitable to address the topic at hand?  Does this organization have a particular bias?  Beware of advertisement, corporate, political, and activist websites.  Each clearly has an agenda and thus not neutral.
  • Note:  * Never assume that extremist points of view are always easy to detect. Some sites promoting these views may look educational.
  • What is the relationship of the author and the publisher? Was the document that you are viewing prepared as part of the author’s professional duties (and, by extension, within his/her area of expertise)?
  • Does this web document reside on an individual’s personal webpage? This type of information resource should be approached with the greatest caution.
  • Has the page been recently updated?  Is the text error free?  Is the site well-designed?

Subject Expertise

The author of a work needs to be aware of related research in that subject area.  The following criteria serve as a rubric for evaluating the literature knowledge of a source:

  • The document includes a bibliography.
  • The author alludes to or displays knowledge of related sources, with proper attribution.
  • The author displays knowledge of theories, schools of thought, or techniques usually considered appropriate in the treatment of his or her subject.
  • If the author is using a new theory or technique as a basis for research, he or she discusses the value and/or limitations of this new approach.
  • If the author's treatment of the subject is controversial, he or she knows and acknowledges this.
  • Accuracy:  Accuracy or verifiability of details is an important part of the evaluation process, especially when you are reading the work of an unfamiliar author presented by an unfamiliar organization or presented in a non-traditional way. Consider these criteria when evaluating accuracy:
  • The document relies on other sources that are listed in a bibliography or includes links to the documents themselves.
  • The background information can be verified for accuracy.
  • For a research document, an explanation of the research method(s) used to gather and interpret the data is included.
  • The methodology outlined in the document is appropriate to the topic and allows the study to be duplicated for purposes of verification.

Currency

Currency refers to the timeliness of information. In printed documents, the date of publication is the first indicator of currency; for reliable, web-only publications, you should still be able to determine its publication or last updated data. Apply the following criteria to ascertain currency:

  • The document includes the date(s) at which the information was gathered (e.g., US Census data).
  • The document refers to clearly dated information (e.g., "Based on 1990 US Census data").
  • The document includes a publication date or a "last updated" date and information on the regularity of updates.
  • The document includes a date of copyright.
  • If no date is given in an electronic document, you can view the directory in which it resides and read the date of latest modification.

Why evaluate websites?

Since anyone can, and probably will, put anything on the Internet, it is necessary first to evaluate the material before using it for academic purposes.

Using the criteria of authorship, publisher point of view, subject expertise, and currency can also help you evaluate resources you find out on the web.

Scholarly vs. Popular Articles

You may ask yourself why you might use a scholarly article over a popular article for your research. Many times your instructor will state that you have to use scholarly (or peer-reviewed) articles for your research. The chart below details differences between scholarly and popular articles. It doesn't mean one is better than the other, it just means that at times a scholarly article is going to better serve your research needs.

If you have questions about using a particular article for your research, please check with your instructor or a librarian.

Criteria Scholarly Article                                                         Popular Article

Authorship

 

Authors are scholars and experts in the field. Authors are always named, and their institutional affiliation is given.    

Authors are staff writers or journalists.
Publisher

 

Publishers may be university presses or professional associations. Articles may be edited through the peer-review process by scholars in the same field of study.

Publishers are corporations, working for profit.
Content/Length     

 

Articles are longer with a focus on research projects, methodology and theory. Language is more formal, technical, using discipline specific terminology.

 

Articles may be shorter with a general focus on the topic and written for news or entertainment value.

Sources Cited

 

Sources are cited and a bibliography or footnotes provided to document the research.

Sources are not usually cited.
Structure

 

Article may include these sections: abstract, literature review, methodology, results, conclusion, and a bibliography.   

Specific format is not followed.
Audience

 

Audience consists of academics, scholars, researchers, and professionals.

Audience is the general public.